Advent is back, so the Reddit atheists and pagan LVRPers have returned to display their historical and biblical illiteracy.
December 25 really is the date of Jesus’ birth.
Zechariah was in the priestly course of Abijah. Thus he served in the temple in the 8th and 32nd week of the year.
Luke’s Gospel has him serving on the Day of Atonement (at the end of September) and conceiving John the Baptist right when he got home.
This places John’s birth in late June.
The Catholic Church has traditionally celebrated the Nativity of John the Baptist on June 24, which fits Luke’s time line perfectly.
The Protoevangelium of James flat out confirms St. John’s late September conception. Sure, it’s apocryphal, but that doesn’t disqualify it as a source of historical data.
Luke clearly states that Jesus was conceived when Elizabeth was six months pregnant with John.
Scriptural, traditional, and historical evidence place John’s birth in late June. Adding 6 months puts Jesus’ birth in late December.
This is nothing new, either. The Church Fathers knew the evidence & reached the same conclusion.
St. John Chrysostom preached his famous Christmas Morning Homily on December 25, 388.
St. Hippolytus, who died in AD 235, wrote, “The first advent of Our Lord in the flesh occurred when He was born in Bethlehem on December 25.”
But the tradition goes back even further than that!
St. Theophilus, d. AD 181, wrote, “We ought to celebrate the birthday of Our Lord on what day soever the 25th of December shall happen.”
There you have it. The Bible, eyewitnesses to Jesus’ ministry who knew and loved Him–including His mother–and His Apostles’ early successors, give strong testimony that Jesus really was born on December 25.
There are really only 3 objections to affirming December 25 as the actual date of Christ’s birth. I’ll answer them in turn.
Objection 1: Luke has shepherds tending their sheep on the night of Jesus’ birth, but shepherds don’t graze their flocks in winter.
Answer: Bethlehem has a similar climate to Houston. You’ll find sheep out in the pasture in both places year-round.
Objection 2: The Church “baptized” Saturnalia, an ancient Roman feast, by setting the celebration of Christmas to the same date.
Answer: Saturnalia was held on the Winter Solstice, between December 17 and 23. The dates simply don’t match. Close only counts in horseshoes & hand grenades.
Objection 2: OK, if not Saturnalia, then Sol Invictus.
Answer: The Emperor Aurelian did decree the feast of Sol Invictus in 274, prior to the first documented celebration of Christmas on December 25, 336. But there’s no record of Sol Invictus’ celebration on December 25 until 354, when Julian the Apostate moved it in the original War on Christmas.
TL; DR: Scripture, tradition, & history attest to December 25 as Christ’s actual birthday. Atheists got nothin’. Merry Christmas!
Looking for fun adventure fiction by an author who doesn’t hate Christians? Look no further!
Yay, my favourite yearly repost!
I reblogged that just for you, now.
In addition to the no-sheep-graze-in-December-in-Palestine non-argument, Have you heard the one asserting that Caesar wouldn’t have called a census in winter? (Or something like it)
The only criticism I’ve heard of the census specifically asserted that people wouldn’t have been ordered to their ancestral homes. But it was only mentioned in passing, and I never heard the evidence supporting it.
I have read that there were other documented censuses that did in fact require everyone to return to their “home district.” Might have been in “The Case for Christ” by Lee Strobel, but I’m not sure. Anyway, pretty much every detail of Luke’s account has been undebunked.
Thanks. Figured it would have been.