Hopeful LibCath Listicle

Life Teen Mass

Way back in the mists of time before the Trump years, #GamerGate, and even the Sad Puppies days, Fr. Dwight Longenecker’s blog was on my regular rotation. Fr. D. is a former Anglican priest, Catholic convert, and indie author whose balanced commentary proved quite helpful in the early days of Pope Francis’ pontificate. One of the AF crowd put him back on my radar recently with a post about the sure and imminent decline of Liberal Catholicism.

The late Cardinal George of Chicago said, “Liberal Christianity is a failed experiment.” At this time in the church there seems to be a rise in the liberal or progressive wing of Catholicism. However, those who are concerned about this should keep several big picture aspects in mind.

First of all, our dear old Catholic Church, when it tries to keep up with the times, is invariably about twenty or thirty years behind the times. That is to say, when the Catholic Church started bringing in folk hymns and round churches and groovy priests, the trend had already pretty much reach a peak and was fading out.

Father brings up a quality of the Church that inspires confidence in me, as well. To expand on his point, the Catholic Church is she who thinks in centuries. Even the relatively rapid changes following Vatican II have taken decades to enact. And the council is still nowhere near full implementation.

Which is a fly in their ointment that LibCaths often complain about, and with good reason. The whole Liberal experiment is well on its way to burning itself out. It’s now the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of the current regime’s architects who’re coming to power. And they’ve proven incapable of maintaining the system they inherited. See the self-immolating blunders of the last several wars of choice and the latest backfire in Brazil.

For all the pressure put on the Church’s hierarchy, we still have a supreme pontiff who calls trannyism diabolical and upholds the male-only priesthood. Even the most liberal prelates hold positions on par with your average 1980s suburbanite. On that timeline, Liberalism will have collapsed as a cultural force years before achieving drastic changes to Church teaching. The window for accomplishing that goal has already closed, if the new generation of priests’ conservative streak is any indication.

Secondly, liberalism is always a protest movement. It always has to have something to campaign against. But now it has become the establishment default setting it has rather had the wind knocked out of its sails. Liberalism is driven by anger and if there is nothing to rage about you run out of gas.

Fr. D. gets the first part right. Liberalism is a negative identity, and liberal theologians always succumb to the trap of doing theology against something.

With all due respect, though, his conclusion doesn’t follow from that premise. You just have to look at the political and cultural spheres to see why.

It’s an old saying in dissident circles, but demand for racism/sexism/homophobia always exceeds the supply. The lack of real hate crimes doesn’t make Lefties shrug, say, “Gee, guess I was wrong,” and change their minds. Because you can’t reason people out of ideologies they weren’t reasoned into. Instead of packing it up and going home when their Death Cult is falsified, Lefties just invent enemies to justify their hatred.

Thirdly, liberal Christianity is, by definition an adaptive ideology. It believes that to survive, Christianity has to adapt to every age and culture in which it finds itself. If the culture and age in which it finds itself is still residually Christian there’s no problem, but if the culture and age in which it finds itself is radically anti-Christian, then to adapt to the culture is to cease to be Christian. Thus we have liberal Catholics who, incredibly, support same sex marriage, abortion, remarriage after divorce and who knows what else that isn’t really part of the Christian religion

This point boils down to saying that Christianity is a revealed dogmatic religion. If you believe A, B, and C, you are Christian. If you don’t, by definition you’re not. As such, it’s impossible to be a Christian in good standing while giving intellectual assent to any of the errors Father lists above. This is in fact what droves of orthodox Catholics have been pointing out when they call for the excommunication of public figures who obstinately agitate for these grave evils. The catch is that Fr. D’s rationale presupposes bishops with the faith and courage to declare that these LibCaths have separated themselves from the Church.

Thanks be to God, some of them are finding the backbone to step up and do their jobs.

Fourth, liberal Christianity focusses more on this world than the next. It is concerned more with making this world a better place than preparing for a better place. People aren’t dumb. They soon realize that you don’t need to be religious to make the world a better place, so they sleep in on Sundays. Liberal Christianity is therefore self defeating.

Here, Father describes the boiling off process I’ve discussed before. Fedora-tippers may crow about the decline of Christianity in America, but what the statistics they cite show is people who are already various shades of apostate making formal breaks with the Church.

What you had in America over the past 60 years was Greatest Generation prelates deciding they didn’t need traditional liturgy, Boomers deciding they didn’t need traditional doctrine, and Xers deciding they didn’t need the Church.

So the nuAtheists are right that self-professed Christians are down per capita, but if you zoom out, you see that confessional identity has fluctuated a lot throughout American history. The lukewarmers leave, and the white-hot core of believers endure to issue forth again.

With this in mind, here are ten reasons why, despite the present appearances, Catholic liberalism will shudder, fade out, flicker and die.

  1. Liberalism goes out of date – Because it is concerned with being up to date and relevant it very quickly goes out of date and becomes irrelevant. I realized this when I used to celebrate a LifeTeen Mass at which the music was provided by groovy grannies and hip hop Pop pops. The teens stood there with their arms crossed and with bored expressions. They were having to listen to awful Catholic tunes that were out of date even when they were written.
  2. Liberalism is derivative – There is nothing new about Catholic liberals. All their ideas are borrowed from the surrounding culture or from Protestant sects that pioneered them decades ago. It’s second hand feminism. It’s second hand homosexualism. It’s second hand ecological concern. It’s second hand Marxism. Anything derivative is unoriginal and already on its last legs.
  3. Liberal Catholicism is moralistic, therapeutic Deism. Rather than a supernatural, vitalized dynamic church, liberal Catholicism has become a set of moral guidelines (usually social morals not personal morals) a method of self help or therapy combined with a vague spirituality. This doesn’t have much oomph. The batteries die and this kind of religion fizzles out.
  4. Liberal Catholicism is increasingly indistinguishable from Liberal Protestantism. I understand fully why Liberal Catholics are so keen on ecumenism with Liberal Protestants. They already believe (or mostly disbelieve) all the same stuff and have the same agenda. They believe they are already unified–and for the most part they are right.
  5. Liberal Catholicism is not distinctive. One of the reasons traditional Catholic parishes are thriving and the seminaries and convents and monasteries that are traditionally minded are doing well is because they are distinctive. They look Catholic and they witness to the truth, beauty and goodness of the Catholic faith. When I wear my cassock everyone admires–Catholics and non-Catholics. Traditional Catholicism is not afraid to make a witness and that’s what people expect and admire in a religion
  6. Liberal Catholic worship is dull and has run out of steam. What new direction for Catholic worship? More bland songs and banal choruses? More fuzzy wuzzy feel good theology? More fan shaped suburban auditoriums with padded pews? People are tired of that and suddenly a beautiful church with Gregorian chant is the thing that is new and exciting and powerful.
  7. Liberal Catholic theology is out of touch and irrelevant. I go into ordinary parishes to lead parish missions. The people are hungry for good, solid Catholic content. The professional theologians in their ivory towers with their worldly politically correct agenda don’t touch their lives. Instead through mens’ conferences, renewal meetings, parish missions and a range of events the ordinary people are rising up and God is raising up powerful teachers, evangelists, speakers and theologians and Bible scholars to fuel a new wave of grass roots dynamism in the church.
  8. Liberal Catholicism is the establishment religion. One academic feminist said to me recently, “I prefer to work within the system.” Well, that’s the kiss of death to any spirit led movement as far as I’m concerned. The Liberal establishment system might control their journals, their colleges and control things in Rome and in the dioceses, but the real life of the church is at the grass roots level, and those folks have zero connection with what is really going on.
  9. Liberal Catholicism is not refreshing its ranks. Where are the new vocations for all those religious orders where all the sisters are ancient? Where are the young priests in liberal dioceses? Where are the young brothers and monks for the old liberal religious orders? The young stay away from these orders. They can smell the rot and if they are not kicked out for being rigid, they clear off.
  10. Liberal Catholicism doesn’t need a reformation. It will simply fizzle out. Nobody is listening. The younger ones are not rebelling against it. They’re just ignoring it. Nobody is taking notice. Traditional Catholics aren’t even bothering to fight against the Liberal Catholics very much anymore. They are just rolling up their sleeves and getting on with being historic, orthodox, dynamic, Evangelical Catholics.

Not this Catholic or that Catholic, but just faithful Catholics.

This is why there is no real cause for worry. Time is on the side of the traditional Catholics. The young priests are more traditional. The young nuns, the young monks, the young families. The future is young. The future is strong. The future is faithful.

It is if China has anything to say about it.

 

Happy, hopeful, and practical

Read it now:

11 Comments

  1. CantusTropus

    I would like to point out that, around about the time of the American Revolution, weekly Church attendance rates in the Thirteen Colonies hovered around just 17-20%, if my memory serves correctly. It has been worse throughout Europe and America at various points in history. Faithfulness has always wavered back and forth, and we have Christ’s promise that it will continue to do so until Judgment Day. The 1950s were a high water mark for religiosity in America, and while that was a good thing, it should not be taken as normative. Things will not always “keep going down”.

    • That’s one of the stats I was looking for but couldn’t pin down before press time. Thanks.

      And yes, I’ve heard of much worse numbers from Europe, such as only one old woman showing up for Easter Sunday mass at Notre-Dame de Paris in 1801.

      The enemy love to gloat over numbers like these because a) they love FUD tactics, and b) as Liberals, they believe that the majority opinion determines truth. So if Christians become a minority, the faith will be ipso facto falsified.

      They somehow never apply that standard to themselves, such as when small minorities supported anal marriage and child sacrifice.

    • Andrew Phillips

      We talked about something like that that last semester in my Church History class. Dr. Campbell pointed out that the decline we see in church attendance in the UMC is relative to an upswing church attendance in the middle decades of the last century. Back then, going to church was normative, as you pointed out. It isn’t any more, which feels like a loss and a contributing factor to all the other ways society seems to be unraveling. But, if what we lost is the illusion that we had successfully evangelized the nation, the falling away is a chance to actually do what we only thought we had done. At, the same time, we’re shrinking here in the US but growing in the global South – particularly in Africa. Who knows? Perhaps God in His grace will re-evangelize American and Europe from Africa and Asia.
      If Christendom is a thing of the past in the Global North, as it seems to be, then the mission field is our own backyard.

      • CantusTropus

        Amen. May those who we helped to plant the seeds of Faith in come and teach us in turn, if such be God’s Will. That’ll be a hard pill to swallow for some, but if we have turned aside from God and embraced abominations, what else is there to say? I once met a Wignat who tried to use this as an argument against Christianity, but unsurprisingly, it didn’t work (obviously, as it is only persuasive if you have made an Idol out of Race).

  2. Malchus

    He who weds the spirit of the age will find himself widowed in the next.

    • The Death Cult thought they’d found a way around that truism with their End of History theory. As current events are proving, we’ve still got plenty of history left.

      • Rudolph Harrier

        I had a talk with an older coworker the other day, who straddles the line between Gen X and Gen Jones. He is a firm leftist and of the strain where he thinks that all reasonable people are leftists. But a leftist of the 80’s and 90’s, and he was panicking about the current age’s radicals. At one point he actually said “what happened to the idea of freedom of speech?” All I could think is “you’ve gotten this far in your life and you’re just now waking up to that scam?”

        But he thought that his leftist utopia ideals were the end stage of history, and he couldn’t comprehend of a new generation despising him and everything he stood for.

        One thing I’ll give to Zoomer leftists: they don’t seem to have any illusions about the fact that if they do succeed that their descendants will destroy all traces of their legacy. They just accept it because they have no concept of a lasting legacy in the first place.

        • The Leftist conceit that their ideology is just the default view of reality instead of a cult with its own quirks and assumptions goes hand-in-hand with End of History doctrine. Both are rationalizations that let them excuse themselves from ever having to refute – or even consider – opposing viewpoints.

          When you get down to it, that’s the Death Cult’s only trick: Furious handwaving to dodge debate, followed by a declaration of victory. Deploying that tactic against Aristotle and Aquinas gave them carte blanche to redefine reality on a whim. But as your left behind Lefty learned the hard way, discounting reason in favor of raw will leaves no limiting principle.

          It turns out there is a hard and fast reality under all the Death Cult word games. And the Cult is on a collision course with it.

  3. Xavier Basora

    Brian,

    Just yesterday I came across a Q &A interview with a young Catalan journalist (she’s 25) about her faith journey. Very interesting, and it trends with what you’ve analyzed in the post.
    https://www.catalunyareligio.cat/ca/montserrat-dameson-faig-servei-parlant-jesus-esglesia

    She has a twitter account and talks about religion here and there:
    https://twitter.com/damesonpareras

    I’ve seen this trend where people make a conscious choice to believe. Either because they reasoned their way through it (i.e.Oriol Junyqueres, history prof at University of Barcelona and later secretary general of the Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya) or, in the case of Montserrat, she chose to live the life of a believer prompting a lot of her generational cohort to ask her questions about what it’s like to live the Faith.

    Sorta implementing St Josemaria Escrivà’s dictum be holy as you do office work, washing dishes, doing your homework, etc.
    She’s not Opus, just a regular young adult who lives the faith.

    xavier

  4. Matthew L. Martin

    I’ve been convinced for years that the current pontificate (not so much the pontiff himself as those around him and the Neo-Ultra-Montanists in the Catholic press) is the last gasp of the post-Vatican II revolutionaries.

    • Most indications are that the next pontificate will be even worse. But don’t sweat it. If a pope were going to bind the faithful to grave error, it would have happened by now. And after the next Holy Father will come the renewal.

      Nonetheless, I pray you’re right.

Comments are closed