Helping others clear away intellectual obstacles to faith in God and His Church is every theologian’s solemn obligation. As Fr. Chad Ripperger has said, Hell is so bad that we shouldn’t even wish it on our worst enemy.
So it is in a spirit of fraternal charity that I offer the following guide to help Truth seekers find the way to God.
Defining God
The first obstacle that must be surmounted is the generally debased state of contemporary philosophy and language itself. Let’s start by defining the key term God, as far as is possible for limited beings.
When Christians–and some theist philosophers like Aristotle–say God, we don’t mean an old man on a mountaintop composing a global naughty/nice list when he’s not conjuring boulders he can’t lift. Such a being would fall into the category of a creature, albeit a powerful creature, existing within the material, temporal order.
What we mean by God is the uncreated, all-powerful, and absolute Being who transcends the created order.
Proving God’s Existence
Anyone who says God’s existence can’t be proven is either ignorant or lying. The deception usually lies in moving the goalposts regarding what constitutes evidence. Materialists are fond of demanding physical proof of God while they themselves required no physical proof for materialism.
The claim that God’s existence can’t be proven contains another subtle a priori bias. It assumes that God exists in the same way that a hydrogen atom, a pencil, or an aardvark exists; that is, contingently within the order of creation. God does not have existence per se. It’s more accurate to say that God is Being. The Bible sees eye to eye with Aristotle here. “I Am that I Am.”
In truth, absolute, uncaused, necessary Being is self-explanatory. The physical universe is more in need of an explanation–both from its origins and at every moment–than the eternal, transcendent God.
Christians are sometimes accused of begging the question by positing a self-necessary Being from the start and declaring God’s existence a fait accompli. That accusation gets the process backwards. Theologians and philosophers start from evidence gathered through observation, experience, and reason and conclude to absolute Being.
The most elegant and time-tested arguments for absolute Being are the cosmological arguments refined by St. Thomas Aquinas. Moderns and Postmoderns will glibly scoff that these arguments have long been discredited. But each attempt to refute the classical arguments from cosmology is revealed as a straw man under scrutiny.
Here’s a common cosmological argument. An apple ripens on a tree branch. That means the apple had the potential to move from unripeness to ripeness, and that potential was put into act. We can rightly ask where the impetus to actualize that potential came from. Apples aren’t self-sufficient. They need water, sunlight, and a host of other conditions to grow. You can try locating the source of the apple’s actualization in any or all of these contingencies, but that just kicks the can a little farther down the road since water, the sun, etc. all contain potentialities requiring external contingencies to actualize.
Positing that it’s contingent beings all the way down doesn’t do any good. That just gets you an infinite train of boxcars with no locomotive. Such a train would be incapable of motion. Similarly, an infinite chain of contingent causality could never move the apple from unripeness to ripeness.
We do see apples that ripen and myriad other examples of actualized potential, yet an infinite chain of contingent beings would be absurd. The only logical conclusion is that a being which is pure act with no unrealized potential is the ultimate source of all being. Since existing potentially instead of in actuality is a limitation on being, that which is pure act must be unlimited being and is therefore Being itself. And that is what Christians call God (hat tip to the late Mike Flynn).
Finding God
Men of intellectual honesty and sound mind can conclude to God’s existence through reason alone. But because God is transcendent, entering into a personal relationship with Him requires that He take the initiative. The means by which God has initiated relations with mankind is called divine revelation. There are three major revealed religions, but you expressed an attraction to Christianity, so I’ll restrict myself to that subject.
Christians believe that God revealed Himself in stages, starting with His revelations to the Hebrew people and culminating in His Incarnation in the Lord Jesus Christ. No serious scholar denies that Jesus lived, and it is a matter of historical record that He founded a Church. St. Irenaeus, a student of St. Polycarp, who himself learned at the feet of the Apostle John, wrote in ca. AD 180:
Since, however, it would be very tedious, in such a volume as this, to reckon up the successions of all the Churches, we do put to confusion all those who, in whatever manner, whether by an evil self-pleasing, by vainglory, or by blindness and perverse opinion, assemble in unauthorized meetings; [we do this, I say,] by indicating that tradition derived from the apostles, of the very great, the very ancient, and universally known Church founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul; as also [by pointing out] the faith preached to men, which comes down to our time by means of the successions of the bishops. For it is a matter of necessity that every Church should agree with this Church, on account of its preeminent authority.
Irenaeus wrote those words within eighty years of the last Apostle’s death. The same span of time separates us from Chamberlain’s meeting with Hitler and Orson Wells’ notorious War of the Worlds broadcast. In the life of the Church, eighty years isn’t a day. It was five minutes ago.
Jesus founded a Church and clearly expressed His desire that men come to know God through its ministry. St. Irenaeus, writing too recently to have gotten confused, affirmed the succession of apostolic authority through the Church’s bishops. Furthermore, he upheld the bishop of Rome’s preeminent authority in the strongest terms.
In summation, God fully revealed Himself in Jesus Christ. Jesus founded a Church to bring people into personal relationship with Him. Scripture and history testify that the Church Jesus founded can be recognized by an episcopate with valid apostolic succession headed by the bishop of Rome.
Only one church existing today meets these criteria: the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. To reject her is to Reject Christ, and to reject Christ is to reject the One who sent Him.
Christian Fellowship
In all honesty, demonstrating God’s existence and the doctrine of petrine primacy is easy compared to giving advice on Christian fellowship. The Church on earth is populated with human beings, and people are inevitably influenced by their environment. In the Postmodern world, our environment pressures us to be atomized, consumerist, individualists.
The Church has been affected by these destructive social trends, but she also offers the antidote. Mythologist Joseph Campbell wrote about how people need communal ritual to apply the power of myth to their daily lives. As C.S. Lewis pointed out, Christianity is a myth that happens to be true.
The relationship between God and man isn’t reducible to a vertical “me and Jesus” dynamic. Like the Cross, it must also include the horizontal “me in the Mystical Body of believers” axis.
All of that is to say, Go to church.
Get exclusive access to my patron-only Discord group, first looks at my monthly creative output, and the chance to make your mark on my works.
Become a Neopatron on Patreon or SubscribeStar now.
I fell into a modern agnosticism for a very long time as a young adult, probably because I was not particularly serious about the question.
Thanks to some very human encounters I came to believe in Hell and evil before I came to believe in God. Thanks to earth not being Heaven, it’s possible to preview Hell very imperfectly here.
I had the cartoon version (“Sky Daddy”) of both God and Hell in my head, despite being confirmed. Hell to me was a place that people who broke arbitrary rules was thrown to big lake of fire. It took reading about what the Catholic Church actually taught about those topics to wrap my head around a loving God and a Hell that was not arbitrary, but a place people volunteer to be because they can’t love God due to sin. I sometimes wonder if Confirmation classes might benefit from throwing out everything modern and making sure everyone made through Dante’s Divine Comedy instead. That would have helped me a great deal.
Protestant’s “Jesus and Me” structure is certainly very appealing. What I find hilarious is tripping over (sincere) evangelicals statements “Christ is King!” and realizing they have no idea how kingdoms actually work. If you’re a normal member of a half decent sized kingdom, a once in lifetime personal audience with the king can only be Very Good or Very Bad. Most people are under some flawed direct authority derived from the king (quite often several layers down), because we can’t all answer directly to the king.
Where that breaks down is that Jesus as God does have that power. However, it seems like learning to work in the Church Militant is rudimentary practice for what is expected of us in the next life. It seems like are supposed to work together as a human race. Ah well, Purgatory is there for everyone who repents whether they believe in it or not in this life.
Praise God for the grace of conversion!
Are you claiming Islam is a revealed religion?
“But some may say: I do not wish to rule, it suffices for me that I be not damned. This cannot be. Either you will be a king and have a kingdom, or you will be damned.”–St. Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Matthew C.25 L.3 P.2095
I didn’t know till now that Michael Flynn had died last October. Absolute sock in the gut – worse than Christopher Tolkien, as I’d actually corresponded with the man. Thank you for telling me.
Majestic work altogether.
Your appreciation blunts the sting of discharging that sad duty. Having also written Mr. Flynn, I can confirm he was among the best of us.
I was introduced to Mr. Flynn through “Eifelheim.” It was quite shocking to read a modern book that presented a Catholic priest – and one from the late middle ages at that – as an intelligent and learned man, and honest in his belief. Although I don’t normally enjoy tragedies or character-driven novels, it instantly became one of my very favorite books despite being both because it feels like it _should_ be a true story, and it’s not hard to read it as hidden history rather than fiction.
His loss leaves a void we’ll be hard-pressed to fill.