In the late 20th century, rock and roll was still the dominant force in music. If you belong to the Baby Boom through Y generations, rock music formed the soundtrack of your life.
But since the late 1990s, rock’s popularity has steadily declined, overtaken by other genres like hip-hop, pop, and electronic music. What caused this shift? Many factors played a role, but rock’s increasing disconnection from its audience, fueled by longer albums, inconsistent quality, and reliance on technical crutches, contributed significantly to its fading relevance.
One of the key factors contributing to rock’s decline has been the shift toward longer albums. In the vinyl era, the time limits imposed by the format forced artists to be selective, offering albums that were typically 35-45 minutes long. Artists had to focus on their best work.
But with the advent of CDs and later digital formats, maximum album length stretched to well over an hour. Longer albums aren’t inherently bad, but the result often has been more filler and less consistency. While a few songs on each album might have the punch, energy, and innovation rock fans expect, many tracks feel like afterthoughts, filling up space rather than contributing to a cohesive artistic vision. This diluted quality made it harder for listeners to connect with records and, by extension, recording artists.
Related: Who Killed Roack and Roll?
As album lengths grew, their consistency suffered. Gone were the days when every track on an album felt like it deserved to be there. Instead, listeners found themselves skipping over mediocre or uninspired songs to reach the one or two standouts. This lack of focus alienated listeners, especially younger audiences who began gravitating toward genres like hip-hop and pop.
The growing trend of releasing albums with just a handful of worthwhile tracks not only undermined rock’s status as a cohesive art form, but its competitive edge. Fans were more likely to download or stream individual songs, further eroding the whole concept of an album.
Meanwhile, rock’s previous generations of fans, who once immersed themselves in album-oriented rock (AOR), struggled to pass the tradition down to younger listeners who were used to cherry-picking singles.
But that wasn’t the final nail in rock’s coffin.
The death knell of mainstream rock has been its increased reliance on technical crutches like autotune and drum quantizing. A distinguishing feature of rock music was its raw, human energy—guitar riffs played with feeling, vocals that might crack but always conveyed emotion, and organic drum beats that had a real musician’s touch. But as digital production techniques became more common, so many producers embraced the new tools that pretty much all bands had to.
Autotune, originally developed to correct pitch imperfections, has now become a mainstay used to create unnaturally perfect vocal performances. As a result, the raw emotion that once defined rock music has been smoothed out and sanitized into a synthetic sound that’s indistinguishable from pop.
It’s the same story with drum quantizing, which aligns drum beats to a computer-perfect grid. This artificial process just saps the energy from rock tracks.
In classic rock, a slight variation in timing could make the music feel alive. You heard real musicians playing in the moment, not following a sterile grid. Quantizing strips away that human touch, creating a robotic precision that’s antithetical to what made rock exciting in the first place.
Tl; dr: If you want to know how rock and roll lost its groove, this is it.
That’s not to say these tools don’t have value when used sparingly. But rock’s overreliance on them made the music feel mechanical and formulaic. The change in priority from performance to production perfection cost rock its grit and its soul.
Related: Can’t Stop the Rock Faucet
At the same time, other genres, particularly hip-hop and pop, began to capture the youth market. These genres adapted quickly to digital music trends, while rock, tied to its more traditional roots, struggled to keep up. Furthermore, hip-hop producers had long been viewed as musicians who made no less contribution to the creative process than the headliners. So while rock producers self-demoted from musician to technician, hip-hop’s tradition of deep producer involvement helped it retain a sense of album production as artistry.
So where does rock go from here?
While rock may never return to its position as the dominant genre in mainstream music, it’s unlikely to vanish altogether. Independent and underground rock scenes continue to produce innovative music, often eschewing the trends that led to mainstream rock’s decline. These movements show that authetnic rock and roll is still alive—just outside the spotlight.
To revive itself, mainstream rock would need to return to its roots: focusing on quality over quantity, embracing the imperfections that give music its humanity, and recapturing the raw energy that made it so electrifying in its heyday. Whether or not it will reclaim the limelight, rock’s real power may lie in its ability to evolve on the fringes, where experimentation may let it flourish once again.
In an age when digital perfection often overshadows artistic integrity, rock’s decline serves as a reminder that sometimes, what connects us to music isn’t how flawlessly it’s produced, but how deeply it reaches us on a human level.
The deep lore of Tolkien meets the brutal struggle of Glen Cook in the dark fantasy prelude to the acclaimed Soul Cycle.
In all creative fields, technology makes it so easy to make something. It’d take discipline to underutilize the technology so artificial limitations could bring out the creativity in the artist.
Few will want to do it because the mindset is to always make full use of the tools you’re using. Doesn’t matter if it’s a disc that can fit 45 min worth of songs or one that can fit 3hrs.
In America, that will be more of a challenge because our cultural stigma is “the line always goes up” “go big or go home”. Never slowing down, never downsizing, never limiting. It’s a gluttony which has contributed to the excess waste in the creative field.
The other side of the coin is, as mentioned before with videogames, the ignorance of such limitations being a key ingredient for creative genius. You don’t know what you don’t know.
Rock’s never going to have much mainstream commercial success, I think, but younger musicians who understand on at least an intuitive level all the points you mentioned above make me think it’s not as dead as it seems.
I think of Colorado-based producer Corey Coffman, whose home studio has been cranking out one great album after the next, in the vein of 80s and 90s alternative bands. His own group Gleemer is consistently excellent as are the groups he’s recorded like Soft Blue Shimmer, Seer Believer, Roseville, Modern Color, and more, all of which are inspired by some combination of dream pop, shoegaze, emo, punk, post-hardcore, and alt rock. Which is just the sort of thing I like, anyway.