This past year especially, the media blitz trying to psyop people into conflating Generation Y and Millennials seems to have gone into overdrive.
But reality always wins.
Now, the inherent absurdity of predictive models that lump in kids born oline with those who didn’t have cell phones until college is becoming unignorable.
And one internet influencer who notices Generation Y is Agent Poso.
I have previously described what I refer to as the “Centennial” cusp generation, which I distinguish from both Millennials and Generation X
Here are the key points of my theory:
Time Frame:
Born Roughly Between: 1981 and 1990, although some definitions might slightly vary, making them younger than traditional Gen X but older than core Millennials
Unique Cultural Identity:
Last Analog Generation: Centennials are described as the last generation to have experienced significant parts of childhood without pervasive digital technology. They remember the transition from analog to digital life, including the introduction of the internet, but weren’t born into it like Millennials.
Cultural Nostalgia and References:
90s Pop Culture: They have a deep connection to and nostalgia for 90s pop culture, including TV shows, music, and the general vibe of that era. Shows like “Batman: The Animated Series,” “Gargoyles,” and other early Nickelodeon shows were significant to their childhood identity. Nirvana, Smashing Pumpkins, No Doubt, were key bands.
9/11 occurred during high school for Centennials and many joined the military as a result
Technological Transition:
Digital Transition: This generation has lived through the significant technological shifts from dial-up internet to broadband, and from no cell phones to having them become common, but not ubiquitous from birth.
Economic and Social Challenges:
Financial Crisis: Many were entering or already in the workforce during the Global Financial Crisis, which shaped their views on work, money, and economic security
Independence and Self-Reliance:
Cusp Generation: They embody aspects of both Gen X’s independence (due to less parental oversight in the pre-digital era) and the communal aspects of Millennials but with fewer of what might be described as Millennials’ ‘hangups’—less entitlement or different expectations regarding career and life.
Identity:
Centennial Identity: Simply put, Centennials don’t act like Gen X or core millennials, necessitating the separate label
Social Media and Internet Use:
Late Adoptions: While they use social media, they might not have the same level of digital native intuition as Millennials or Generation Z, having adapted to these technologies later in life
Centennial Theory positions this group as having a particular vantage point due to their experiences straddling two major generational cohorts, experiencing both the end of an analog childhood and the beginning of the digital age. Their identity, according to this theory, is shaped significantly by these transitional experiences, making them distinct in cultural, technological, and economic terms.
Labels aside–I’m find with “Centennial Generation,” just as I’ve also used “The Nintendo Generation” as a more illustrative synonym for Gen Y–Posobiec’s observations have a high degree of overlap with generational tendencies we’ve documented here.
Related: Marketing MillennialsÂ
If Poso notices Generation Y, you can bet that others will, too. In fact, his prescription for Centennials’ predestined role in society aligns with my classification of Ys as a Fourth Turning theory Artist Generati0n.
Related: Hope for Gen Y
I, for one, wholeheartedly welcome the increasing public consciousness of Generation Y. Because contrary to my expectations, The Baby Boomers are not skipping over their elder and younger children to bestow power direclty on their Millennial grandkids. Surprisingly, they are letting history’s middle children, Gen Y, inherit the kingdom.
Now, the most likely reason for this historic upset is not a last-minute change of heart on the part of the Boomers. Instead, it seems they bought into the aforementioned marketing campaign, which convinced them that Generation Y are Millennials.
Lesson learned. Never underestimate the Holy Television.
The good news is that their terminal nostalgia may actually be edging Gen Y further away from Millennials’ worst political excesses. It turns out that a generation obsessed with the cultural product of the late twentieth century isn’t keen on plowing under everything made before 1995. That means Ys may be poised to take on their role as Artists who hand down the last living memory of America at its height. The pop culture iconoclasts may not win the day after all.
And that alone is why the freshman class of Gen Y leaders and artists should get the benefit of the doubt.
Get early looks at my works in progress, the chance to influence my writing, and VIP access to my exclusive Discord.
Sign up at Patreon or SubscribeStar now.
“Happy, hopeful, and practical”
Learn to regain your dignity and have fun while you’re at it! Read now:
This is actually a fairly interesting wrinkle in how things are going. While Gen Y certainly have issues of their own, they are the only generation with the means to lead right now. Gen X is too old, Millennials are too destructive, and Zoomers are much too young. If we can successfully strike that balance of understanding the past while building towards a future it can do much good.
Still think we should have Gen X looking over our shoulders and Zoomers being mentored while we work, though. We need to remember when the Boomers forgot: this isn’t a one man show.
” Gen X is too old, Millennials are too destructive, and Zoomers are much too young.”
50-60 are still leadership years, but we are getting long in the tooth. Many I know are getting close to retirement. I just don’t know if they can retire.
I think it’s the Millennials that are out of everything probably the wildcard. The Zoomers are already pretty conservative, and they are aren’t even in their 30’s yet.
“Still think we should have Gen X looking over our shoulders and Zoomers being mentored while we work, though. ”
I’m happy to say that most Gen X in my personal experience are far less hands off than the Boomers. We’re generally willing to train.
The challenge now is curing Ys of the temptation to go back to the 90s. Knowlege of how America used to be is only half the equation. While acknowledging that, yes, it was better then, we need to drive home the fact that the world of Gen Y’s youth is long gone. A good approach is to point out the benefits of creative destruction, i.e., sometimes things fall apart so they can be reassembled in better arrangements.
The rejection of Millennial iconoclasts could be an interesting dimension to the recent election that deserves more attention. The shock troops of movements like BLM, Antifa, transgender advocates, and other leftist, revolutionary, and deranged factions, are overwhelmingly Millennial. It’s clear that everybody older and younger is absolutely sick of the agenda to destroy and revolutionize everything, and a rejection of those movements is tacitly a rejection of the Millennial troops and thought leaders immersed in them.
Gen Y, with their instincts toward preservation and openness to appreciate the past which can be teased into actual important things beyond 80s-90s nostalgic entertainment, would seem to be well-positioned to fill the void, and that seems to be just what we’re observing now.
There’s a certain irony that the Boomer’s faith in the Holy Television led them to dupe themselves with the marketing that Gen Y are millenials.
Something, something “The works of the Enemy are eventually self-defeating”.
Oft an evil will shall evil mar.
I think that a lot of Boomers, and Gen Z and younger kids, just genuinely don’t understand that Y is a separate cohort. They’ve never really stopped to consider that maybe, as Poso put it, “hav[ing] experienced significant parts of childhood without pervasive digital technology” might make a pretty substantial difference in how one perceives the world, amongst other things.
Where I think Gen Y holds an advantage is in balance; they can appreciate good things about the past but lack the revolutionary impulse of Millennials and Boomers, and are less cynical and insular than Gen X. This even-keeled potential could make Gen Y well positioned to gracefully navigate the downsizing of global empire and potentially avoid a precipitous collapse.
But where things get challenging is that, anecdotally speaking, I don’t think a lot of us are cut out to be leaders. Maybe we’ll manage against all odds to grow into it? The “Artist” generation descriptor is apt, as this would appear to be the best way for Gen Y to leave its mark.
It is profoundly bizarre to me, though, that recently I’ve seen Millennials end at 1995 rather than 2000, which is where Gen Z starts. This seems like some sort of admission that the standard generational model is off, but it has the odd effect of shrinking down the size of the Millennial cohort and artificially inflating the numbers of Gens Y and Z. 

In 2019 Pew Research revised the end of the millennials/beginning of the zoomers to 1996. I had a link to a news article stating this, but the link died after I saved it. However you can go through the page history of “Millennials” on Wikipedia to see the rewrite in action. Originally the end date was not set, since the generation was new. In the late 2000’s you’ll see the end date vary wildly from 2000 to 1994 or vague descriptions like “the mid to late 90’s.” But around 2010 it stabilizes to ending “in the early 2000s.” Then in 2019 they add a graphic from Pew Research that has the generation ending at 1996, and soon enough 1996 and only 1996 becomes the official definition.
This shows another part of why the insistence on keeping to the “official” definitions is so stupid. Those definitions aren’t even five years old, and could easily change again if they need to fit something else into the model.
Exactly. We know Wikipedia and the MSM can’t be trusted. Better to go by observable differences in behavior and temperament, which are becoming undeniable.
I later found that while the news article I was using is down, the original announcement by Pew Research is still up.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
On January 18, 2019 it was commonly accepted that people born from 1997 to around 2004 were millennials. On January 19, 2019 all of these people instantly became Zoomers.
Note that there are only two definitive reasons that Pew Research gives for ending the generation in 1996. The first is that it makes the length of the generation 16 years, which matches their definition for Generation X. They also tentatively use this length for Generation Z. (This in turn means that the constant objection of “but generations must be 20 years long!” isn’t even consistent with the “official” generations.)
The second is that smart phones became ubiquitous in 2007, meaning that anyone born after 1996 would have been at most 10 when they came out and thus would not have had a meaningful portion of their childhood without a smartphone. Of course if you apply the same reasoning to 9/11 (which the article mentions but doesn’t explicitly use to set the date) then you get the dividing line between Millennials and Gen Y.
That’s some solid research!