It is with no regret whatsoever that I inform you they still can’t say it.
Exhibit A: The troll that scuttled in yesterday to snipe at Nick Fuente from behind the cover of Christian morality
But is he just a garden variety troll, or a witch?
There’s one sure way to find out:
Gentle readers, the Witch Test.
Still inerrant
Let me draw your attention to a few key facts:
One, I gave the subject more than the standard 24-hour time limit to make the profession of faith. As we all know, a Christian should be eager to proclaim his faith in Christ Jesus. Holding his tongue for a day and more constitutes a fail.
Two, note how he can’t resist befouling his alleged Christian polemic with Death Cult hexes. It’s a Dr. Strangelove level of compulsion.
Third, he straight up lies. Here’s just one instance that’s easy to fact check:
As far as the post in question aging poorly, in it I wrote:
But as of this writing, the most probable outcome is that Kent loses by under a thousand votes. The second most likely result is [he] takes the silver by a few hundred-vote margin.
That means the groypers did this.
And the result, after a week of counting that saw mysterious pauses while outstanding ballot totals rose and fell in a microcosm of 2020, was Joe Kent finishing second by a vote tally in the hundreds.
Which Nick himself stated as a groyper victory condition.
And every candidate they backed still won.
There’s a way to level honest criticism at my post, and it’s to say, “The outcome you said was the most likely scenario didn’t happen. Instead, we got the second most likely outcome.”
That’s fair. And true. It proves my calculations were a little off.
It doesn’t disprove my main contention, which is that AF is a serious political movement that punches above its weight.
Think of the situation in context.
Joe Kent had endorsements from Steve Bannon, Tucker Carlson, and Donald Trump. He had funding from Peter Thiel. And they ran him against a Republican who voted to impeach Trump. They were smart; they didn’t take any chances.
Yet the guy with Thiel money and 140K Twitter followers who went on Tucker multiple times came within a hair of defeat.
As smarter political pundits have pointed out, the race was Kent’s to lose. Full disclosure: I believed them and was skeptical of Nick’s war against Kent. Heck, I was sure he would sail into first place, which would have hurt AF’s credibility. Nick’s last-minute decision to cancel a groyper rally in Kent’s district convinced me his crusade against Kent would backfire.
But I was wrong. Instead of rocketing across the finish line, Kent was subjected to a week of languishing in third place before a sudden – and suspicious – windfall inched him into second.
And contra the witch, anybody who’s run for any office from class president to senator knows Kent wasn’t feeling dismissive about Nick. He was sweating every minute he stayed in third. Because losing this race would end his political career.
You don’t have to take my word for it. The witch’s own team acknowledged the threat AF posed to Kent.
So much for that item.
The following are submitted for the more esoteric-minded, and those in the mood for a quick chuckle.
First, here are the top 3 candidates’ vote totals:
Now here’s what a quick check of the troll’s location showed:
Of course a troll from Salem would end up being a witch.
I should have done that search sooner and saved some time.
This is how you know Halloween’s right around the corner.
For an even spookier story than this election, read my hit horror adventure novel:
“Nature Boi” started three paragraphs in a row with “in fact”, that alone is, how do the kids say it these days, “sus”.
Good catch. Put it in the New Devil’s Dictionary alongside “to be clear” and “make no mistake.”
Weird. That’s my neck of the woods about 10 miles away. Scio is definitely not Salem though. Very rural; they prefer sheep to young boys out there.
As for Fuentes, I was surprised when I found out you support him. The guy is a pressure release just like Trump proved to be. We aren’t voting our way out of the death cult.
“Very rural; they prefer sheep to young boys out there.”
Somebody call the _burn_ ward!
“As for Fuentes, I was surprised when I found out you support him.”
Why is that surprising? I’ve voiced support for Trump, too – just not out of the false hope that he’d save us singlehandedly. Both of Trump’s campaigns and elections proved worthwhile, in that they forced the regime to drop all pretense and move into the end phase.
As for Fuentes, put yourself in the guy’s shoes. Here’s a kid who’s been prepped for a career in politics since junior high. His only fault was being born ten years too late. Otherwise he’d be where guys like Matt Walsh, Scott Greer, or Elijah Schaffer are now.
Imagine a son of lesser Russian nobility who’d been primed to take his place in the Czarist bureaucracy since childhood. Then the revolution breaks out just as he comes of age.
Yes, clinging to the imaginary TRUMP of his revanchist fantasies is a cope. But it’s also understandable. Coming to terms with the fact that the world you were brought up to survive in no longer exists takes time. Being Gen Y, I should know.
But Nick has proven himself to be intelligent, resourceful, and most of all, faithful. Cozy TV alone would be reason enough to take him seriously. As it is, he’s the leader of the Dissident Right. Maybe that’s due to a total lack of competition, but it’s nonetheless true.
You should understand I’m neither an individualist nor a Liberal. Nick is the leader. My place is to follow him. This isn’t difficult.
Huh. I think it just clicked for me. Same with the pope question last week. And it is a bit difficult, because we operate from different interpretations of morality.
Is it charitable to say you believe a man is morally insulated when his group does evil because of bad but legitimate leadership? Following: this insulation remains in tact for the duration of the legitimacy of the leader?
“And it is a bit difficult, because we operate from different interpretations of morality.”
Fair. Now submit to the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, the sole authentic source of moral authority in the West.
“Is it charitable to say you believe a man is morally insulated when his group does evil because of bad but legitimate leadership?”
No. The Church commands obedience to all legitimate authorities in all things *except* sin. What evil are you referring to?
I submit to the laws of God, communicated by Jesus Christ, and preserved in the Bible as the Holy Spirit allows me to understand. I have trouble with other authorities.
I was speaking generally, but the My Lai Massacre would be a solid example.
Slaughtering unarmed civilians is not only a sin but a war crime, so no order to do it can be legitimate.
Now, what does a Vietnam-era massacre have to do with Pope Francis or Nick Fuentes?
Again: on almost every ground, I wish I could support Nick Fuentes. But the whole “villainizing Jews and blacks on racial grounds” thing stops me cold. As I am of Jewish descent, he simply will not have me as a supporter. It doesn’t fit his narrative. I just now tried to find him explicitly praising Clarence Thomas to prove myself wrong, and… nothing. At least not in text form on Bravesearch.
Good grief, stop letting the enemy frame the narrative for you. The reason you can’t find Nick Fuentes quotes is because every mainstream outlet is running a hush campaign against him. That includes Fox News, where not even Tucker Carlson is allowed to say his name.
Here is Jewish congressional candidate Laura Loomer thanking Fuentes for his endorsement and endorsing him in return: https://t.me/loomeredofficial/20119
In the future, try watching his show instead of swallowing lies told by people who banned him.