If your protagonist sucks, your story will suck.
The engine that drives every story has three parts: a protagonist, something the protagonist wants, and an antagonist (human, environmental, psychological, etc.) who obstructs the protagonist’s attainment of that goal. When you relate what the protagonist does to overcome the obstacles in his way, you are telling a story. Since so much rides on the protagonist, he’d better be interesting.
Here are a few tips for writing protagonists who engage and interest readers.
Goals
As all writers worth their salt will tell you, a protagonist must be properly motivated. There must be some goal that drives him through to the end of the story. Passive characters tossed about by events are dull.
Pseudorealism
Not realism. For genre fiction the idea is to give your characters, especially the protagonist, enough believable personality traits to balance the make-believe elements.
Which brings us to …
Relatability
A protagonist’s mindset and motivations should be largely intelligible. This doesn’t mean that you have to spell everything out. In fact, a touch of mystery is good for sci-fi stories. However, if your main character is inaccessible to common human experience, readers will have trouble vicariously inserting themselves into the tale through him.
That in turn leads us to …
Sympathy; not Pity
The key to engaging readers is to ease their acceptance of the protagonist as a vehicle for their own vicarious experience. They must live the story through the main character.
There is a spectrum of audience reaction to certain characters that runs from empathy to sympathy to pity.
- Empathy: feeling what someone else feels as if you were that person.
- Sympathy: commiserating with someone else’s emotional state.
- Pity: sorrow for another’s suffering with undertones of negative emotions like regret, disappointment, contempt, etc.
If readers can actually empathize with your protagonist – which I’m not even sure is possible to do for a fictional character – you’ve achieved the holy grail of characterization. If on the other hand the reader feels sorry for the protagonist with an undercurrent of contempt, you’ve engendered pity. Consider reworking to story to elicit sympathy; possibly by giving the character more agency.
It’s easier to describe what sympathetic characters aren’t instead of what they are. They’re not sad sacks; nor do they have to be perfect. Protagonists can even have genuinely rotten flaws such as flagrant bigotry and past murder convictions. As long as the character has at least one redeeming virtue and expresses at least tacit remorse for past wrongdoing, he can earn our sympathy.
For a thrilling example of goal-driven, complex yet sympathetic characters who stay relatable while adventuring in a science fantasy underworld, read my acclaimed horror-SF novel:
“However, if your main character is inaccessible to common human experience, readers will have trouble vicariously inserting themselves into the tale through him.”
Really? Really?
Gandalf, Aragorn, Gimli, Frodo, Gollum….? Screwtape-?!
Yes, for one narrow type of story.
Not for all.
Yes
Not the main character, not the main character, not the main character, main character and super-relatable, not the main character … the main character, and involved with one of the most relatable aspects of the human condition.